The combi-targeting concept: evidence for the formation of a novel inhibitor in vivo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the purpose of developing drugs that can block multiple targets in tumor cells, molecules termed combi-molecules or TZ-I have been designed to be hydrolyzed in vitro to TZ+I, where TZ is a DNA-damaging species and I is an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Using HPLC and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), we investigated the mechanism of in vivo degradation of a prototype of one such combi-molecule, ZRBA1, which when administered i.p. rapidly degraded into FD105 (Cmax=50 micromol/l, after 30 min), a 6-aminoquinazoline that was N-acetylated to give FD105Ac (IAc) (Cmax=18 micromol/l, after 4 h). A similar rate of acetylation was observed when independently synthesized FD105 was administered i.p. More importantly, the EGFR binding affinity of IAc was 3-fold greater than that of I, indicating that the latter is converted in vivo into an even more potent EGFR inhibitor. The results in toto suggest that while in vitro TZ-I is only hydrolyzed to I+TZ, further acetylation of I in vivo leads to a third component--a highly potent EGFR inhibitor with a delayed Cmax.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".