Electrical conductivity of sidewall-deposited fluorocarbon polymer in SiO2 etching processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-aspect-ratio SiO2 contact hole etching is one of the key processes in the fabrication of ultralarge scale integration devices. However, there are many serious problems, such as charge-build-up damage, etching-stop, and microloading effects. Charge accumulation in high-aspect-ratio contact holes during etching is one of the main causes of these problems. In SiO2 etching using fluorocarbon gases, it is well known that a fluorocarbon film is deposited on the underlayer surface and sidewall of contact holes. It is also predicted that an increase in the conductivity of the fluorocarbon film deposited on the SiO2 sidewall markedly reduces the charging potential in the high-aspect-ratio contact holes because of the high conductivity of the deposited polymer. To clarify these phenomena, it is necessary to obtain quantitative measurements of the conductivity of the sidewall surfaces in contact holes. Therefore, we fabricated the sensing device using semiconductor production technology, and monitored sidewall current of SiO2 contact holes on the silicon wafer. The relationship between the chemical structure and sidewall current of the fluorocarbon films deposited in contact holes is investigated. We have found that highly cross-linked and unsaturated fluorocarbon polymer causes high sidewall conductivity in SiO2 contact holes. It is suggested that the deposited fluorocarbon film reduces the charging potential during the SiO2 etching process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".