MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011458510 · doi:10.1002/sia.3634

Proposed ToF‐SIMS/XPS standardization methods for bonding wires in electronic packaging applications

2010· article· en· W2011458510 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSurface and Interface Analysis · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIon-surface interactions and analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyStandardizationWire bondingSecondary ion mass spectrometryCharacterization (materials science)Materials scienceMass spectrometryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NanotechnologyComputer scienceChemistryEngineeringChemical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Time of Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (ToF‐SIMS) and XPS were utilized to assess the surface characteristics of the bonding wire generally used in electronic packaging applications. This paper outlines the proposed standard methodologies for the analysis of the high‐curvature surfaces of the fine bonding wires (less than 1.2 mil (30 micron) in diameter) using specially designed stages and systematic data acquisition and analysis. Examples are given to showcase the effectiveness of the methodology, which is able to differentiate various industrial process residues and contaminants on the bonding wire. A preliminary draft of the proposed standard surface characterization methods is presented. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score0.872

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it