MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011460424 · doi:10.1142/s1758825113500142

WAVE REFLECTION IN PIEZOELECTRIC HALF-PLANE

2013· article· en· W2011460424 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiaoguang Yuan, Zheng Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Mechanics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Research Foundation
KeywordsPiezoelectricityReflection (computer programming)Longitudinal wavePlane waveTransverse wavePhysicsSurface waveBoundary (topology)Boundary value problemMechanical waveWave propagationLamb wavesLongitudinal modeTotal internal reflectionAcousticsOpticsWavelengthMathematical analysisMathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The assumption of quasi-static electric field in the problem of wave reflection in piezoelectric half-plane results in missing an independent electric wave mode at the piezoelectric boundary, which leads to oversimplified solutions of reflected waves in a strong piezoelectric medium if only elastic bulk wave boundary conditions are considered. The paper presents a novel solution to address the issue by using the inhomogeneous wave theory and introducing a virtual reflection wave mode in addition to the elastic bulk wave modes. The virtual wave is assumed to satisfy the Snell's law as well as the piezoelectric boundary condition and can be treated in the same way as the elastic bulk waves. The analysis results show that this virtual wave always propagates along the boundary for any incident angle and can be treated as a pseudo surface wave. The energy transmission analysis reveals that this surface wave transmits zero energy and does not violate the energy conservation between the incident and the reflected elastic bulk waves. In addition, the analysis also reveals an interesting result that the quasi-transverse, not the quasi-longitudinal, incident wave will be fully reflected and no quasi-longitudinal reflected wave will be generated if the incident angle is beyond a critical angle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Applied MechanicsSame topicThermoelastic and Magnetoelastic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207