Impact of <i>Bythotrephes longimanus</i> on zooplankton assemblages of Harp Lake, Canada: an assessment based on predator consumption and prey production
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Following the 1993 invasion of Harp Lake by Bythotrephes longimanus a number of small‐bodied zooplankton declined dramatically compared to pre‐invasion densities, and some larger species increased. 2. To test whether these changes were caused by Bythotrephes, we measured its consumption of zooplankton in 1995 and compared this to production by the prey species with which it overlapped spatially and temporally. 3. On a seasonal basis Bythotrephes consumption was 199 mg dry mass (DM) m −2 , or 25% of zooplankton production which was 783 mg DW m −2 . However, for some species, such as the small copepod Tropocyclops extensus , consumption greatly exceeded production—this was one of the species noted to decline in Harp Lake following the appearance of Bythotrephes . By contrast, for the larger cladocerans Daphnia galeata mendotae and Holopedium gibberum , consumption was much less than production—these species were observed to increase following the invasion. 4. Our results thus support the hypothesis that zooplankton changes in Harp Lake were caused by Bythotrephes . We speculate that lower quality prey remaining in Harp Lake may lead to reduced densities of Bythotrephes , or impose strong selective forces that lead to new adaptations by this predator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".