Radiofrequency Perforation System for In Vivo Antegrade Fenestration of Aortic Stent-Grafts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability to create in vivo antegrade fenestrations (IVAF) using a radiofrequency probe in juxtarenal aortic stent-grafts to preserve the patency of renal arteries. METHODS: Modified stent-grafts with an unsupported fenestration area were deployed in the juxtarenal aorta of 2 25-kg dogs. Prior to deployment, both renal arteries were marked with detachable coils that were later removed (dog 1) or with hydrophilic catheters (dog 2). After deployment, a radiofrequency probe was used to perforate the graft. If puncture was successful, attempts were made to pass guidewires into the renal arteries for balloon dilation and stenting of the graft perforation. Doppler ultrasound scans of the renal arteries were taken after 1 week. Doppler ultrasound and angiography were repeated prior to autopsy and macroscopic analysis at 1 month. RESULTS: Fenestration was attempted in 3 renal arteries (1 in dog 1 and 2 in dog 2). It was successful in 2 renal arteries but required 6 attempts in dog 1 and 3 in dog 2. The failed case was related to the position of a stent-graft strut close to the fenestration area. One stent thrombosis was seen during follow-up, while the other fenestrated artery remained patent. No stent fracture was encountered during follow-up. CONCLUSION: This radiofrequency device allowed successful fenestration but was difficult to control. Technical improvements are required to improve clinical success and patency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".