MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011547655 · doi:10.1586/erd.12.53

Edwards SAPIEN™ and Edwards SAPIEN XT™ transcatheter heart valves for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis

2012· review· en· W2011547655 on OpenAlexaff
Mélanie Freeman, John G. Webb

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Medical Devices · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStenosisValve replacementAortic valve replacementCardiologyInternal medicineSurgeryAortic valve stenosisHeart valveAortic valveRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aortic stenosis is the most common heart valve lesion, with aortic valve replacement being the most common type of valve surgery in the Western world. With the aging population, more and more patients are declined for surgical aortic valve replacement owing to age and comorbidities. Without intervention, morbidity is significant and early mortality inevitable. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is an exciting technology offering an alternative, less invasive treatment in those not eligible for surgery. The Edwards SAPIEN and Edwards SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valves are currently in widespread use, with promising outcomes in terms of short-to-medium-term mortality and valve durability in high-risk patients or patients not eligible for surgical valve replacement. Randomized trials are currently underway to assess transcatheter aortic valve replacement in lower risk surgical candidates, while long-term mortality data are keenly awaited.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.008
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.387 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Medical DevicesSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207