Rediscovery of the Yesso scallop pathogen Perkinsus qugwadi in Canada, and development of PCR tests
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Perkinsus qugwadi, a pathogenic protozoan parasite of Yesso scallops Patinopecten yessoensis, is found only in cultured populations in British Columbia, Canada. This pathogen was first identified in 1988 and caused significant mortalities at some locations during the early 1990s. Prevalence of infection decreased dramatically following 1995, and the disease was last reported in 1997, leading to speculation that the Yesso scallop stocks in Canada had developed resistance to the disease, or that P. qugwadi had disappeared. However, the present study revealed that infection with P. qugwadi and associated mortality is still occurring in scallops from at least one location in British Columbia. One of the PCR tests developed for P. qugwadi detected the parasite in a 105-fold dilution of DNA extracted from a heavily infected sample and detected 52% more positive scallops than histology; however, the assay also cross-reacted with P. honshuensis and P. olseni. The other PCR test was less sensitive and detected 34% more positives, but did not react to any of the other Perkinsus species tested, suggesting that these PCR tests are powerful tools for screening for the presence of P. qugwadi. Phylogenetic analysis of 1796 bp of SSU rRNA gene sequence clearly indicated that P. qugwadi is positioned basally to other Perkinsus species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".