MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011662339 · doi:10.2118/117285-ms

Case Study in Venezuela: Performance of Multiphase Meter in Extra Heavy Oil

2008· article· en· W2011662339 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ana Marin, Onerazan Bornia, Bruno Pinguet

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil reservesSeparator (oil production)Petroleum engineeringOil productionEnvironmental scienceFossil fuelMetering modeMetrePetroleumGeologyWaste managementEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The objective is to present accurately the performance of the combination of a venturi and multi energy gamma ray in a case study in Venezuela. The focus will be on practical information, knowledge sharing to overcome all classical problems due to fluid behavior met by multiphase metering device in extra heavy oil including classical separator. Heavy and Extra-Heavy Oil represents more than 50% of the worldwide oil reserves, and large efforts have been spent to overcome difficulties related to this kind of oil production. Venezuela has pone of the largest reserve of HO and EHO with more than currently 1.5 trillion of oil in place. Different set of technologies and methodologies have been used to overcome the technical production and monitoring challenges in these lifted or pumped wells. Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA) at the opposite of Canada companies is currently producing most of the Heavy Oil from cold and therefore non thermal production methods due to historical reasons. Recently, Orocual field in Monagas Northern (Venezuela) was put in production a cluster with extra heavy oil reaching gravity from 8.6 to 11 API and with a viscosity range from 6 Pa.s to more than 20 Pa.s at line conditions. As per fact, this new production cluster did not have any data, and PDVSA could only use conventional storage tanks to try to estimate the liquid flow rate with no possibility to be able to get the gas production because no separator were able to work in these conditions. However, it was essential to PDVSA in this early phase of the development to review the performance of the field and get access to the oil, water and gas flow rates. In these challenging conditions, and after trying other multiphase meters said to work in Extra Heavy Oil, PDVSA found that the only solution was Venturi - multi energy gamma ray combination. This multiphase technology broke the extra heavy oil paradigm related to multiphase technology to measure flow rates accurately and a comparative test were capable to demonstrate when it was possible from a reference point of view that the overall uncertainty of the entire system (Venturi-Tank) was better than 2%. This extended the new multiphase technology operating envelope for PDVSA from Gas to Extra Heavy Oil and provided a unique solution and the capability to monitor and optimize in real-time the production in this field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil SymposiumSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207