MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011669229 · doi:10.1097/fpc.0b013e328343dd93

PharmGKB summary

2011· article· en· W2011669229 on OpenAlexaff
Torben Stamm Mikkelsen, Caroline F. Thorn, Jun J. Yang, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Deborah French, Gianluigi Zaza, Henry M. Dunnenberger, Sharon Marsh, Howard L. McLeod, Kathy Giacomini, Mara L. Becker, Roger Gaedigk, J. Steven Leeder, Leo Kager, Mary V. Relling, William E. Evans, Teri E. Klein, Russ B. Altman

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacogenetics and Genomics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institute of General Medical Sciences
KeywordsMarshPhilosophyEnvironmental ethicsHumanitiesBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Methotrexate is a folate analog that is used in the treatment of cancers (e.g. acute lymphoblastic leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, osteosarcoma, and colon cancer) and autoimmune diseases (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, and psoriasis). In the treatment of autoimmune diseases, methotrexate is usually administrated orally or subcutaneously, whereas in the cancer treatment, it can be given orally, intramuscularly, as intrathecal injections, or as intravenous infusions (up to 12 g/m2). The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of methotrexate show large interpatient variability regardless of the route of administration or disease being treated. The goal of this study is to provide an introduction to methotrexate pharmacogenomics, showing the candidate genes in the PharmGKB methotrexate pathway, important variants, discussing key knowledge, and pointing to more in-depth resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2480.171

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations141
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacogenetics and GenomicsSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207