MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011704806 · doi:10.1109/tpds.2013.311

Optimizing the Parallel Tree-Search for Finding Shortest-Span Error-Correcting CDO Codes

2014· article· en· W2011704806 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSpeedupNotationAlgorithmFunction (biology)Tree (set theory)Theoretical computer scienceMathematicsCombinatoricsParallel computingArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Finding optimal/short-span Convolutional Self-Doubly Orthogonal (CDO) codes and Simplified-CDO (S-CDO) codes for a specified order J is computationally very challenging. This paper describes several optimizations that were applied to an implicitly-exhaustive search algorithm in order to reduce the time required for finding these types of codes. The resulting high-performance parallel implementation provides an impressive speedup that is greater than 16 300 (CDO, <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">${\rm J} = 7$</tex></formula> ) and 6300 (S-CDO, <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">${\rm J} = 8$</tex></formula> ) over the reference implicitly-exhaustive search algorithm, and greater than 2000 <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">$({\rm J} = 17)$</tex></formula> over the fastest published CDO validation function used in high-performance pseudorandom search algorithms. These speedups are achieved through enhancements in the deterministic search-space reduction, and a vastly improved validation function that makes use of a novel data structure for enabling data-reuse and incremental computations. The resulting validation function speedup is greater than 60 000 (S-CDO, <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">${\rm J} = 17$</tex></formula> ) and 190 000 (CDO, <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">${\rm J} = 17$</tex></formula> ) when compared to its reference implementation. The combination of optimizations and load-balancing techniques allowed us to leverage hundreds of processor cores in order to complete an exhaustive search over a search space that is some <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">$10^{14}$</tex></formula> times larger than what was previously possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it