MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011769831 · doi:10.1103/physreve.76.011124

Diffusion in channeled structures. III. Quantum corrections induced by lattice vibrations

2007· article· en· W2011769831 on OpenAlexaff
Benoit Palmieri, David Ronis

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum chaos and dynamical systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsSemiclassical physicsPropagatorLattice (music)QuantumMathematical physicsQuantum mechanicsCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For large energy barrier systems the lattice vibrations can play an important role in the diffusion of a guest component inside channeled structures. Here, quantum corrections to the guest diffusion are studied within a semiclassical framework in which the guest behaves classically and the lattice quantum mechanically. The permeability is expressed in terms of correlation functions that are calculated using path integrals. Forward-backward path integrals for propagators are combined, and, using the Martin-Siggia-Rose formalism [Phys. Rev. A. 8, 423 (1973)], are transformed into a set of generalized Langevin equations that reduce to the classical equation of motion at high temperatures. The random initial conditions to these equations are specified by the density matrix from which an approximate expression for the quantum mechanical potential of mean force is derived. The quantum potential of mean force and activation energy obtained for the guest inside the lattice is slightly higher than the one for the fully classical system, and the diffusion of the guest in the quantum lattice is slower compared to its fully classical counterpart. The macroscopic intrinsic permeability of $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-quartz towards neon is reported, ${P}_{\mathrm{qtm}}^{\ensuremath{'}}(300\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K})=9.91\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{8}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{s}∕(\mathrm{mkg})$ within the semiclassical approximation and is lower than ${P}_{\mathrm{class}}^{\ensuremath{'}}(300\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K})=1.26\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{9}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{s}∕(\mathrm{mkg})$ obtained in the classical case at $300\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$ for the same potential model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicQuantum chaos and dynamical systemsFrench-language works237,207