MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011791372 · doi:10.1139/v04-087

Thermodynamic properties of 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane + polyether mixtures up to 60 MPa

2004· article· en· W2011791372 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marı́a J. P. Comuñas, Christian Boned, Antoine Baylaucq, Enriqueta R. López, Josefa Fernández

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsobaric processChemistryThermodynamicsThermal expansionTriethylene glycolRefrigerantCompressibilityIsothermal processActivity coefficientLubricantEtherInternal pressureOrganic chemistryAqueous solution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work we report several derived thermodynamic properties, the isothermal compressibility (κT), the isobaric thermal expansion coefficient (αp), and the internal pressure (π), and their excess functions (κTE, αpE, and πE) for the refrigerant + lubricant mixtures HFC-134a + triethylene glycol dimethyl ether and HFC-134a + tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether. These properties have been determined in wide temperature (293.15–373.15 K) and pressure (10–60 MPa) ranges in an effort to better understand the behaviour of these kinds of mixtures and their thermophysical properties as functions of temperature, pressure, and composition. The analysis of the thermodynamic excess properties (negative values for κTE and αpE, positive values for πE) for both systems shows a high degree of interaction between the refrigerant and the synthetic lubricant molecules. Key words: HFC-134a, high pressure, internal pressure, isobaric thermal expansion coefficient, isothermal compressibility, polyglycol ethers, refrigerant–lubricant mixtures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207