MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2011811871 · doi:10.1086/432642

CO in H<scp>i</scp>Self‐absorbed Clouds in Perseus

2005· article· en· W2011811871 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiative transferMolecular cloudExtinction (optical mineralogy)StarsMonte Carlo methodGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have observed 12 CO J = 2 → 1 and J = 1 → 0 and 13 CO J = 1 → 0 emission in two regions of H I self-absorption (HISA) in Perseus: a small, isolated HISA feature called the "globule" and a more extended HISA cloud called the "complex." Using both large velocity gradient and Monte Carlo radiative transfer codes, we found that in the globule N ( 12 CO) < 6.0 × 10 15 cm -2 , which, using photodissociation region (PDR) models, implies that N (H 2 ) < 9.9 × 10 20 cm -2 . In the complex we found that the H 2 column densities were in the range (1.2-2.2) × 10 21 cm -2 . By comparing the HISA and CO observations we were able to constrain the physical conditions and atomic gas fraction ( f ). In the globule, 8 K < T spin < 22 K and 0.02 < f < 0.2, depending on whether the (unknown) gas density was 10 2 , 10 3 , or 10 4 cm -3 . In the complex, 12 K < T spin < 24 K and 0.02 < f < 0.05, and we were also able to constrain the gas density (100 cm -3 < n < 1200 cm -3 ). These results imply that the gas in the HISA clouds is colder and denser than that usually associated with the atomic ISM and, indeed, is similar to that seen in molecular clouds. The small atomic gas fractions also imply that there is a significant molecular component in these HISA clouds, even when little or no 12 CO is detected. The level of 12 CO detected and the visual extinction due to dust is consistent with the idea that these HISA clouds are undergoing a transition from the atomic to molecular phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→