Characterization by dilute solution and rheological methods of polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate) produced with a tetrafunctional peroxide initiator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Polystyrene (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) samples produced by the bulk homopolymerization of styrene and methyl methacrylate with a tetrafunctional peroxide initiator (JWEB50) are characterized in detail by various solution and rheological methods. For comparison purposes, “linear” PS and PMMA samples were produced under similar conditions with a monofunctional initiator (TBEC). The four sample types were characterized by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) setups to determine molecular weight, radius of gyration, and intrinsic viscosity distributions. Contraction factors were calculated and indicated evidence of branching for polystyrene produced with JWEB50 while no such effects were observed with PMMA. The rheological behavior of the samples was subsequently investigated by performing oscillatory shear and creep experiments. Compared to the “linear” material, samples produced with JWEB50 exhibited a reduction in zero‐shear viscosity that was attributed to long‐chain branching. Retardation spectra were calculated based on creep data and converted to dynamic compliances that were then combined with the oscillatory data. This provided master curves spanning a much wider frequency range than could be obtained experimentally. Examination of various viscoelastic functions showed evidence of long‐chain branching for both polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate) samples produced with JWEB50. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 1340–1355, 2007
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".