Effect of Hormonal Priming (GA3) and Osmopriming on Behavior of Seed Germination in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to evaluate the effect of different seed priming techniques on germination and early growth of two wheat cultivars (Cross Alborz and Sardari) tow experiments carried out at the Razi University Laboratory of Physiology, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Kermanshah, Iran. This study was in two separate experiments. The experiments were factorial arranged in a completely randomized design with four replications. The first factor was seed primed for 12, 18, 24 and 30hours, the second was four concentrations of gibberellic acid (50, 100, 150and 200 ppm), PEG-6000 (-0.3 MPa) and the third was two wheat cultivars. Seeds were primed for 12, 18, 24 and 30 hours at temperature 25°C in different solutions. Results showed that for hormonal priming, maximum shoot and root length, shoot and root dry weight and germination rate were observed at GA 50 ppm and 24 h treatmeant in Cross-Alborz and Sardari cultivars. For osmmopriming maximum shoot and root length, shoot and root dry weight and germination rate were abserved at 12 h treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".