MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011868437 · doi:10.1139/v08-089

Probing DNA polymerase activity with stereoisomeric 2′-fluoro-β-D-arabinose (2′F-araNTPs) and 2′-fluoro-β-D-ribose (2′F-rNTPs) nucleoside 5′-triphosphates

2008· article· en· W2011868437 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chang G. Peng, Masad J. Damha

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryStereochemistryPolymeraseNucleosideDNA polymerasePrimer (cosmetics)DNARiboseDNA polymerase IEnzymeBiochemistryRNAReverse transcriptaseGeneOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2′-Deoxy-2′-fluoro-β-D-ribonucleosides (2′F-rN) and 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-β-D-arabinonucleosides (2′F-araN) differ solely in the stereochemistry at the 2′-carbon of the furanose sugar ring. 2′F-rN 5′-triphosphates (2′F-rNTPs) are among the most commonly used sugar-modified nucleoside 5′-triphosphates (NTPs) for in vitro selection; however, the epimeric 2′F-araN 5′-triphosphates (2′F-araNTPs) have only recently been applied to polymerase-directed biosynthesis [C.G. Peng and M.J. Damha. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 5310 (2007)]. The present study describes primer extension assays that compare, for the first time, the incorporation efficiency of the two isomeric NTPs, namely, 2′F-araNTPs or 2′F-rNTPs, by four DNA polymerases [Deep Vent (exo-), 9°Nm, HIV-1 RT, and MMLV-RT]. Under the conditions used, incorporation of 2′F-araTTP proceeded more efficiently relative to 2′F-rUTP, while the incorporation of 2′F-araCTP is comparable or slightly less efficient than that observed with 2′F-rCTP. Interestingly, these preferences were observed for all four of the DNA polymerases tested. Unexpected differences in NTP incorporation were observed for 2′F-rCTP vs. rCTP. Despite their seemingly similar conformation, they behaved striking differently in the in vitro polymerization assays. 2′F-rCTP is a much better substrate than the native counterpart (rCTP), an observation first made with human DNA polymerases [F.C. Richardson, R.D. Kuchta, A. Mazurkiewicz, K.A. Richardson. Biochem. Pharmacol. 59, 1045 (2000)]. In contrast, 2′F-rUTP behaved like rUTP, providing poor yield of full-length products. Taken together, this indicates that 2′F-rCTP is very unusual with regard to enzyme/substrate recognition; an observation that can be exploited for the production of DNA oligomers enriched with both ribose and arabinose modifications. These findings are timely given the significant interest and growing need to develop chemically modified oligonucleotides for therapeutic and diagnostic research. By examining the structure-activity relationship (SAR) of the ribose and arabinose sugar, this study furthers our understanding of how the nature of the 2′ substituent (e.g., α vs. β; F vs. OH) and the heterocyclic base affect NTP selection (specificity) by DNA polymerases.Key words: 2′F-rNTPs, 2′F-araNTPs, DNA polymerases, biosynthesis, modified nucleoside triphosphates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus researchFrench-language works237,207