Probing DNA polymerase activity with stereoisomeric 2′-fluoro-β-D-arabinose (2′F-araNTPs) and 2′-fluoro-β-D-ribose (2′F-rNTPs) nucleoside 5′-triphosphates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
2′-Deoxy-2′-fluoro-β-D-ribonucleosides (2′F-rN) and 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-β-D-arabinonucleosides (2′F-araN) differ solely in the stereochemistry at the 2′-carbon of the furanose sugar ring. 2′F-rN 5′-triphosphates (2′F-rNTPs) are among the most commonly used sugar-modified nucleoside 5′-triphosphates (NTPs) for in vitro selection; however, the epimeric 2′F-araN 5′-triphosphates (2′F-araNTPs) have only recently been applied to polymerase-directed biosynthesis [C.G. Peng and M.J. Damha. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 5310 (2007)]. The present study describes primer extension assays that compare, for the first time, the incorporation efficiency of the two isomeric NTPs, namely, 2′F-araNTPs or 2′F-rNTPs, by four DNA polymerases [Deep Vent (exo-), 9°Nm, HIV-1 RT, and MMLV-RT]. Under the conditions used, incorporation of 2′F-araTTP proceeded more efficiently relative to 2′F-rUTP, while the incorporation of 2′F-araCTP is comparable or slightly less efficient than that observed with 2′F-rCTP. Interestingly, these preferences were observed for all four of the DNA polymerases tested. Unexpected differences in NTP incorporation were observed for 2′F-rCTP vs. rCTP. Despite their seemingly similar conformation, they behaved striking differently in the in vitro polymerization assays. 2′F-rCTP is a much better substrate than the native counterpart (rCTP), an observation first made with human DNA polymerases [F.C. Richardson, R.D. Kuchta, A. Mazurkiewicz, K.A. Richardson. Biochem. Pharmacol. 59, 1045 (2000)]. In contrast, 2′F-rUTP behaved like rUTP, providing poor yield of full-length products. Taken together, this indicates that 2′F-rCTP is very unusual with regard to enzyme/substrate recognition; an observation that can be exploited for the production of DNA oligomers enriched with both ribose and arabinose modifications. These findings are timely given the significant interest and growing need to develop chemically modified oligonucleotides for therapeutic and diagnostic research. By examining the structure-activity relationship (SAR) of the ribose and arabinose sugar, this study furthers our understanding of how the nature of the 2′ substituent (e.g., α vs. β; F vs. OH) and the heterocyclic base affect NTP selection (specificity) by DNA polymerases.Key words: 2′F-rNTPs, 2′F-araNTPs, DNA polymerases, biosynthesis, modified nucleoside triphosphates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".