Antifungal efficacy of lasers against dermatophytes and yeasts<i>in vitro</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Approximately 2-13% of the world population suffers from onychomycosis. Recently, lasers have been introduced for treatment. However, no effect was found with in vitro laser irradiation of pathogens on agar plates. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of laser irradiation against fungi using an alternative in vitro approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lasers of 808, 980 and 1064 nm were used to heat cell culture media and a nail clipping. Trichophyton rubrum. T. interdigitale. Microsporum gypseum. Candida albicans. C. parapsilosis, and C. guilliermondii species were subcultured and subjected to laser treatments (808/980 nm: 9-27 J/cm(2), 6 ms, 12 × 12 or 12 × 50 mm and 1064 nm: 50-240 J/cm(2), 90 ms, 5-10 mm). After irradiation, the fungal elements were transferred onto agar plates using conventional and Drigalski spatulas and were incubated for 6 days. RESULTS: The highest increase in temperature was found using a 980-nm laser with a pulse duration of 6 ms and a fluence of 27 J/cm(2). The histology work-up revealed a dissection of the nail plate from the nail bed tissue after laser irradiation. Growth inhibition was only found for C. guilliermondii and T. interdigitale. All other pathogens presented only reduced growth, and C. albicans growth was unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a clear thermal effect for linear scanning 980-nm and long-pulsed 1064-nm laser systems on either nail clippings or cell culture media. Complete pathogen growth impairment was achieved if temperatures were measured above 50 °C. The results for the 1064-nm system were almost comparable to 980 nm results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".