MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SIPK conditions transcriptional responses unique to either bacterial or oomycete elicitation in tobacco

2007· article· en· W2011996627 on OpenAlexafffund
Hardy Hall, Marcus A. Samuel, Brian E. Ellis

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Plant Pathology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaTU Graz, Internationale Beziehungen und Mobilitätsprogramme
KeywordsOomyceteBiologyComputational biologyBiotechnologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY The mitogen-activated protein kinase, SIPK (salicylic acid-induced protein kinase), is known to be rapidly activated in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) by various elicitors. However, SIPK activation induced by the oomycete elicitor, beta-megaspermin, is reported to require external calcium influx, whereas that induced by the bacterial elicitor, hrpZ(Psph), does not. This suggests that SIPK activation is involved in different elicitor-initiated signalling pathways, and raises the question of whether the role(s) of SIPK in mediating stress outcomes, including transcriptional re-programming, differs in an elicitor-specific manner. To examine this, we compared the impact of silencing SIPK on the transcript profile of tobacco suspension culture cells challenged with either hrpZ(Psph) or beta-megaspermin. SIPK-silencing was found to have a substantial impact on both hrpZ(Psph)- and beta-megaspermin-induced transcriptional responses, and these impacts included both common and elicitor-differentiated features. As well as revealing a role for SIPK in modulating expression of known redox- and defence-related genes in response to both elicitors, our analysis detected a substantial impact of SIPK silencing on transcription of 80S ribosomal subunit mRNAs. This novel observation suggests that SIPK may play a role in affecting translation efficiency as one mechanism for enacting rapid genome-wide, elicitor-specific physiological reprogramming during defence responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Plant PathologySame topicPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207