Practicing community development and third way politics: Still faking it?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper addresses concerns that stem from the shift toward third way politics by governments in the name of fostering community development and social capital. In this context, voluntarism is something of a double‐edged sword for recreation and leisure studies. The volunteer plays a critical role in community recreation, but may also serve to sanction government abdication of responsibility for equitable and sustainable developments in aspects of community life, including recreation. It is suggested that both citizen and government action is necessary to encourage equality and flourishing of the community as a whole in recreation and leisure. Résumé Sous prétexte de promouvoir le développement communautaire et le capital social, plusieurs gouvernements augmentent la décentralisation de leurs systèmes administratifs, et suggèrent que ces services sont essentiellement une responsabilité locale. Dans ce contexte, ce décalage vers le troisième type de politique semble favoriser le bénévolat. Mais le bénévolat dans un contexte d'études en loisir pourrait être décrit comme une épée à deux tranchants. Il est vrai que le bénévolat joue un rôle critique dans la récréation communautaire, mais ce rôle peut également servir à sanctionner l'abdication des gouvernements de leurs responsabilités communautaires, y compris les services de loisir. On suggère que le citoyen et un gouvernement responsable sont nécessaires pour encourager l'égalité et l'épanouissement des services communautaires et de loisir. Keywords: community development practicepoliticsrole of governmentvoluntarismMots clefs: Pratique en matière de développement communautairepolitiquegouvernementsbénévolat
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it