Split from slip and schist: Crustal anisotropy beneath northern Cascadia from non‐volcanic tremor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polarization and splitting analyses of minute‐long windows of non‐volcanic tremor at 3‐component stations in the vicinity of southern Vancouver Island provide new evidence for the presence of anisotropy within the crustal portion of the North American plate beneath Cascadia. As reported previously, tremor particle motions are predominantly horizontal and inferred to manifest an upgoing wavefield composed primarily of S ‐waves. Under this assumption, estimates of incidence angle and back azimuth can be deduced from orientation of the smallest principle direction of motion. When subjected to standard S ‐wave splitting analysis, most stations yield systematic and reproducible fast polarization directions. Estimates of original polarization direction are more scattered and splitting times often exhibit multimodal distributions. Numerical simulations, wherein band‐limited synthetic seismograms comprising contributions from multiple sources are analyzed for splitting, neatly reproduce these characteristics and thereby provide a framework for interpretation. A number of stations in our study sit astride the San Juan fault which, based on reflection studies, dips approximately 60 to 70° to the north. Underlying these stations is the Leech River Complex consisting of strongly foliated greenschist facies phyllites with steeply dipping foliations striking parallel to fast polarization directions of split S ‐waves. Detailed laboratory velocity measurements at elevated pressures show that as little as 2 to 3 km of vertically dipping Leech River phyllite are required to produce the observed splitting. These phyllites have some of the highest S ‐wave anisotropies measured to date and are part of a once continuous belt of anisotropic crust extending over 2000 km along the western North American coast from southern Vancouver Island to southwest Alaska.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".