Influence of Sacral Morphology in Developmental Spondylolisthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief Study Design. A radiographic study was conducted to investigate sacral morphology in a children and adolescent population with developmental L5–S1 spondylolisthesis. Objective. To determine the relationship between sacral morphology and developmental L5–S1 spondylolisthesis. Summary and Background Data. The morphology of the adult sacrum has been recently shown to be abnormal in low grade spondylolisthesis. However, sacral morphology has never been evaluated in a pediatric population where remodeling and secondary changes are less pronounced. It remains unknown if these changes in sacral morphology are primary or secondary in developmental L5–S1 spondylolisthesis. Methods. The lateral standing radiographs of 131 subjects, aged 6 to 20 years old with developmental L5–S1 spondylolisthesis (91 low grade and 40 high grade) were analyzed with a dedicated software allowing to measure the following parameters, which were analyzed for each subject by the same individual and compared to a cohort of 120 subjects without any spinal pathology with similar age and sex distribution: the sacral table index (STI), sacral table angle (STA), sacral kyphosis (SK), S1 superior angle, S2 inferior angle, and grade of spondylolisthesis. Student t test was used to compare the parameters between the groups. Results. This study demonstrated that STA is significantly smaller (P < 0.01) in children and adolescents with L5–S1 spondylolisthesis compared to a similar control group. Furthermore, STA is significantly smaller in high-grade spondylolisthesis when compared to subjects with low grade. There is also a significant difference in segmental sacral morphology (S1 and S2 anatomy) in the spondylolisthesis group. Increasing sacral kyphosis is also found to be significantly associated with spondylolisthesis. Conclusion. The sagittal sacral morphology is a constant anatomic variable specific to each individual and unaffected by the position of the patient in space. The anatomy of the sacrum in children and adolescents with L5–S1 spondylolisthesis is particular and different from a control group. This study suggests that sacral anatomy may have a direct influence on the progression of spondylolisthesis; a lower STA and higher sacral kyphosis may be 2 factors predisposing to vertebral slip in developmental spondylolisthesis. The morphology of the adult sacrum has been recently shown to be abnormal in low grade spondylolisthesis. A radiographic study was conducted to determine the relationship between sacral morphology and developmental L5–S1 spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. This study suggests that sacral anatomy may have a direct influence on the progression of spondylolisthesis; a lower STA and higher sacral kyphosis may be 2 factors predisposing to vertebral slip in developmental spondylolisthesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".