Performance Evaluation of an Air Source Heat Pump Coupled With a Building Integrated Photovoltaic/Thermal (BIPV/T) System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A theoretical investigation of a variable capacity air-to-air air source heat pump (VC-ASHP) coupled with a building integrated photovoltaic/thermal (BIPV/T) system is presented in this paper. The BIPV/T system was integrated into the roof and the wall. Air was circulated behind the photovoltaic arrays to recover the thermal energy. The warm air recovered was supplied to the VC-ASHP. The thermal performance of the VC-ASHP was investigated for three scenarios when the heat pump is running in heating mode. The three scenarios are: (A) by feeding the ambient air to the ASHP; (B) by coupling the ASHP to the wall integrated BIPV/T only; and (C) by coupling the ASHP to the roof integrated BIPV/T only. The coefficient of performance (COP) of the VC-ASHP was evaluated for these three separate scenarios and compared. A typical winter day result suggests that the COP of the ASHP can be improved by coupling the VC-ASHP to either of the BIPV/T systems, i.e., either to the roof integrated BIPV/T system or to the wall integrated BIPV/T system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".