Copper(II) Complexes of a Series of Alkoxy Diazine Ligands: Mononuclear, Dinuclear, and Tetranuclear Examples with Structural, Magnetic, and DFT Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Picolyl hydrazide ligands have two potentially bridging functional groups (micro-O, micro-N-N) and consequently can exist in different coordination conformers, both of which form spin-coupled polynuclear coordination complexes, with quite different magnetic properties. The complex [Cu(2)(POAP-H)Br(3)(H(2)O)] (1) involves a micro-N-N bridge (Cu-N-N-Cu 150.6 degrees ) and exhibits quite strong antiferromagnetic coupling (-2J = 246(1) cm(-)(1)). [Cu(2)(PZOAPZ-H)Br(3)(H(2)O)(2)] (2) has two Cu(II) centers bridged by an alkoxide group with a very large Cu-O-Cu angle of 141.7 degrees but unexpectedly exhibits quite weak antiferromagnetic exchange (-2J = 91.5 cm(-)(1)). This is much weaker than anticipated, despite direct overlap of the copper magnetic orbitals. Density functional calculations have been carried out on compound 2, yielding a similar singlet-triplet splitting energy. Structural details are reported for [Cu(2)(POAP-H)Br(3)(H(2)O)] (1), [Cu(2)(PZOAPZ-H)Br(3)(H(2)O)(2)] (2), [Cu(2)(PAOPF-2H)Br(2)(DMSO)(H(2)O)].H(2)O (3), [Cu(4)(POMP-H))(4)](NO(3))(4).2H(2)O (4), and PPOCCO (5) (a picolyl hydrazide ligand with a terminal oxime group) and its mononuclear complexes [Cu(PPOCCO-H)(NO(3))] (6) and [Cu(PPOCCO-H)Cl] (7). Compound 1 (C(12)H(13)Br(3)Cu(2)N(5)O(4)) crystallizes in the monoclinic system, space group P2(1)/c, with a = 15.1465(3) A, b = 18.1848(12) A, c = 6.8557(5) A, beta = 92.751(4) degrees, and Z = 4. Compound 2 (C(10)H(13)Br(3)Cu(2)N(7)O(4)) crystallizes in the triclinic system, space group P, with a = 9.14130(1) A, b = 10.4723(1) A, c = 10.9411(1) A, alpha = 100.769(1), beta = 106.271(1) degrees, gamma = 103.447(1) degrees, and Z = 2. Compound 3 (C(23)H(22)Br(2)Cu(2)N(7)O(5.5)S) crystallizes in the monoclinic system, space group P2(1)/c, with a = 12.406(2) A, b = 22.157(3) A, c = 10.704(2) A, beta = 106.21(1) degrees, and Z = 4. Compound 4(C(52)H(48)Cu(4)N(20)O(18)) crystallizes in the monoclinic system, space group P2(1)/n, with a = 14.4439(6) A, b = 12.8079(5) A, c = 16.4240(7) A, beta = 105.199(1) degrees, and Z = 4. Compound 5 (C(15)H(14)N(4)O(2)) crystallizes in the orthorhombic system, space group Pna2(1), with a = 7.834(3) A, b = 11.797(4) A, c = 15.281(3) A, and Z = 4. Compound 6(C(15)H(13)CuN(5)O(5)) crystallizes in the monoclinic system, space group P2(1)/c, with a = 8.2818(9) A, b = 17.886(2) A, c = 10.828(1) A, beta = 92.734(2) degrees, and Z = 4. Compound 7 (C(15)H(13)CuClN(4)O(2)) crystallizes in the orthorhombic system, space group Pna2(1), with a = 7.9487(6) A, b = 14.3336(10) A, c = 13.0014(9) A, and Z = 4. Density functional calculations on PPOCCO are examined in relation to the anti-eclipsed conformational change that occurs on coordination to copper(II).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".