Evaluation of two self-incompatibility alleles in three summer rape (<i>Brassica napus</i> L.) cultivars by UV fluorescence microscopy, seed set and outcrossing rates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
S-alleles W1 and T2 and an incompletely dominant white petal character were introgressed into the self-compatible (SC) summer rape (Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera {Metzg.}) cultivars Global, Topas and Westar. The derived self-incompatible (SI) lines were evaluated for strength of incompatibility by ultraviolet fluorescence of pollen tubes, and by seed set. Pollen tube and seed set analyses showed the W1 and T2 alleles were strongly, moderately and weakly expressed in Topas, Global and Westar, respectively. Seed set data showed a significant difference between SI lines, but not between S-alleles, or between homozygous or heterozygous lines from the same SI cultivar. SI cultivar yellow petal (wild type) lines were field pollinated with SC white petal lines. Seed collected from the SI cultivars were evaluated for proportion of outcrossed progeny by recording the frequency of yellow petal and cream petal plants, which were the result of self- and cross-pollination, respectively. The proportion of outcrossed progeny (i.e., outcrossing rates) ranged from 23% to 79%. Topas SI lines had significantly higher outcrossing rates than Global SI lines, which corresponded to SI line seed set data. Environment, S-allele selection and genotype significantly affected outcrossing rates. Key words: Brassica napus, sporophytic incompatibility, S-allele, outcrossing rate
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".