MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012189545 · doi:10.1353/crv.2007.0020

''Jesus, My Pal'': Reading and Religion in Middlebrow America

2007· article· en· W2012189545 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Erin A. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Review of American Studies · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMiddlebrowReading (process)HistoryLiteratureArtReligious studiesPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bruce Barton was an advertising executive and the author of a best-selling life of Christ, The Man Nobody Knows (1925). Although they were immensely popular, Barton's books are dismissed by scholars today as theologically empty justifications for consumer capitalism. Through an analysis of letters from readers, this essay argues that Barton's work was part of the ''lived religion'' of ordinary Christians, whatever its intellectual or theological failings. First, it filled a vacuum in advice in modern America. Second, it finessed the impersonal scale of urban life by presenting Jesus as a friend. Third, it rendered irrelevant deeply felt contradictions in Protestant America between religion and science, fundamentalism and modernism. I demonstrate a gap between intellectuals and ordinary readers that has implications for our own scholarly practices. Bruce Barton était cadre dans une agence de publicité et est l'auteur d'un best-seller sur la vie du Christ, The Man Nobody Knows (« L'homme que personne ne connaît ») (1925). Bien qu'extrêmement populaires auprès du grand public, les oeuvres de Barton sont ignorées des chercheurs, pour qui elles sont vides de sens théologique et ne constituent que de vaines justifications au capitalisme et á la consommation. Grâce á l'analyse de lettres des lecteurs, cet essai se propose de montrer que l'oeuvre de Barton, quelles que soient ses failles intellectuelles ou théologiques, s'inscrit dans le cadre de la « religion vécue » des Chrétiens ordinaires. D'abord, elle comble un vide de conseils moraux en Amérique moderne. Ensuite, elle humanise certains aspects impersonnels de la vie urbaine en présentant Jésus-Christ comme une sorte d'ami. Enfin, elle neutralise les contradictions, qui marquaient profondément l'Amérique protestante, entre la religion et les sciences, entre le fondamentalisme et le modernisme. L'étude montre qu'il y a une grande différence entre les intellectuels et les lecteurs ordinaires, et que cette différence peut avoir des implications pour nos pratiques de recherche universitaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.011
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Review of American StudiesSame topicBiblical Studies and InterpretationFrench-language works237,207