An experimental investigation of steel-free deck slabs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The steel-free deck slab developed in Canada used straps as a confinement system and relied on the stiffness of this confinement system rather than its strength. In this paper, a new approach, using the strength of a confinement system comprising unbonded prestressed bars, was investigated. In addition, the effect of the concrete strength and the steel ratio of the confinement system was examined. Seven large-scale one-way steel-free deck slabs were built using normal- and high-strength concrete, prestressed to different levels, and statically tested up to failure. The overall behaviour of the slabs was similar to that of slabs confined by straps. Cracking strength was not considerably enhanced. The slabs failed in punching shear mode with high loads. The new approach was not able to overcome the problem of the longitudinal crack, which developed in the tested slabs and reportedly appeared in all the steel-free slabs built or tested previously in Canada. Prestressing had a definite effect, however, on delaying the occurrence of this longitudinal crack, thereby enhancing serviceability. The paper recommends that the serviceability limit state of the steel-free slabs would be better assessed by the occurrence of the longitudinal crack, even though the ultimate capacity of the slabs is high.Key words: arch action, cracking, external prestressing, high-strength concrete, punching shear, steel-free deck slab.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".