Inapproximability for metric embeddings into $\mathbb{R}^{d}$
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider the problem of computing the smallest possible distortion for embedding of a given $n$-point metric space into $\mathbb {R}^d$, where $d$ is fixed (and small). For $d=1$, it was known that approximating the minimum distortion with a factor better than roughly $n^{1/12}$ is NP-hard. From this result we derive inapproximability with a factor roughly $n^{1/(22d-10)}$ for every fixed $d\ge 2$, by a conceptually very simple reduction. However, the proof of correctness involves a nontrivial result in geometric topology (whose current proof is based on ideas due to Jussi Väisälä). For $d\ge 3$, we obtain a stronger inapproximability result by a different reduction: assuming P$\ne$NP, no polynomial-time algorithm can distinguish between spaces embeddable in $\mathbb {R}^d$ with constant distortion from spaces requiring distortion at least $n^{c/d}$, for a constant $c>0$. The exponent $c/d$ has the correct order of magnitude, since every $n$-point metric space can be embedded in $\mathbb {R}^d$ with distortion $O(n^{2/d}\log ^{3/2}n)$ and such an embedding can be constructed in polynomial time by random projection. For $d=2$, we give an example of a metric space that requires a large distortion for embedding in $\mathbb {R}^2$, while all not too large subspaces of it embed almost isometrically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".