MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012279747 · doi:10.1063/1.1430255

Interpretation of the Kohn–Sham orbital energies as approximate vertical ionization potentials

2002· article· en· W2012279747 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekUniversity of Cambridge
KeywordsAtomic orbitalSlater-type orbitalMolecular orbitalValence (chemistry)STO-nG basis setsAtomic physicsIonizationIonization energyPhysicsBasis setKohn–Sham equationsMolecular orbital theoryOrbital overlapChemistryMoleculeQuantum mechanicsDensity functional theoryElectronIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Theoretical analysis and results of calculations are put forward to interpret the energies −εk of the occupied Kohn–Sham (KS) orbitals as approximate but rather accurate relaxed vertical ionization potentials (VIPs) Ik. Exact relations between εk and Ik are established with a set of linear equations for the εk, which are expressed through Ik and the matrix elements εkresp of a component of the KS exchange-correlation (xc) potential vxc, the response potential vresp. Although −Ik will be a leading contribution to εk, other Ij≠k do enter through coupling terms which are determined by the overlaps between the densities of the KS orbitals as well as by overlaps between the KS and Dyson orbital densities. The orbital energies obtained with “exact” KS potentials are compared with the experimental VIPs of the molecules N2, CO, HF, and H2O. Very good agreement between the accurate −εk of the outer valence KS orbitals and the corresponding VIPs is established. The average difference, approaching 0.1 eV, is about an order of magnitude smaller than for HF orbital energies. The lower valence KS levels are a few eV higher than the corresponding −Ik, and the core levels some 20 eV, in agreement with the theoretically deduced upshift of the KS levels compared to −Ik by the response potential matrix elements. Calculations of 64 molecules are performed with the approximate vxc obtained with the statistical averaging of (model) orbitals potentials (SAOP) and the calculated εk are compared with 406 experimental VIPs. Reasonable agreement between the SAOP −εk and the outer valence VIPs is found with an average deviation of about 0.4 eV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it