MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012290200 · doi:10.2337/diacare.28.8.2054

Complications of Type 2 Diabetes Among Aboriginal Canadians

2005· article· en· W2012290200 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anthony J. Hanley, Stewart B. Harris, Mary Mamakeesick, Ken Goodwin, Edith Fiddler, Robert A. Hegele, J. David Spence, Andrew A. House, Edward Brown, Blair Schoales, Ronald Klein, Bernard Zinman

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Care · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)Robarts Clinical TrialsUniversity of TorontoWestern UniversityLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteThunder Bay Regional Health Sciences CentreMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineType 2 diabetesDiabetes mellitusPopulationRetinopathyNephropathyDiabetic retinopathyFamily medicineDiseaseFundus photographyType 1 diabetesOptometryEnvironmental healthSurgeryInternal medicineVisual acuity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite a dramatically increasing burden of type 2 diabetes in Aboriginal Canadian communities (1–5), relatively little information is available regarding the prevalence of, and risk factors for, the complications of type 2 diabetes in this population (6). Although previous studies have documented micro- and macrovascular disease in Aboriginal Canadians with diabetes, the majority of these reports have relied heavily on hospital records, chart reviews, and disease registries (6). These approaches may underestimate the magnitude of the complications burden because only those with the severest disease are included, and standardized methods are infrequently used to document complications. The objective of the present research project was to systematically determine, using validated methods, the prevalence of micro- and macrovascular complications among Aboriginal Canadians who have type 2 diabetes and to identify risk factors that are associated with these conditions. The Sandy Lake Diabetes Complications Study has been presented in detail previously (6). Briefly, all community members known to have type 2 diabetes were invited to participate; 189 of 250 (76%) eligible subjects were enrolled, although the sample size varies given time-limited access to certain equipment. Participants were older than nonparticipants and more likely to be male but did not differ in diabetes treatment. Signed informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the study was approved by the Sandy Lake First Nation Band Council and the Mount Sinai Hospital Ethics Review Committee. We used validated measures to assess retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy, and cardiovascular disease risk factors, as described previously (6). Digital fundus photography was performed using a nonmydriatic retinal camera, with …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.824

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations81
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes CareSame topicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsFrench-language works237,207