PGT25+G4 Gas Turbine Development, Validation and Operating Experience
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The PGT25+G4 gas turbine, latest in GE Infrastructure Oil&Gas PGT25 two-shaft aeroderivative family, is a 34 MW-class gas turbine for mechanical drive and power generation applications and maintains the same efficiency and availability of the previous PGT25+. The PGT25+G4 was validated through an extensive test program, which included some key test-rigs such as the full-scale LM2500+G4 Gas Generator test and other component tests, in advance of the First Engine to Test (FETT). The FETT included an equivalent-to-production configuration package (gas turbine, auxiliaries and control system), ran in a dedicated area in GE Oil&Gas Test Facilities to validate the machine for both mechanical drive and power generation applications. All critical-to-quality parameters of the HSPT (High Speed Power Turbine) were investigated, such as turbine gas path components temperatures and stresses, PT performances and PT operability when coupled with the LM2500+G4 Gas Generator. First production unit is currently in operation at Alliance Pipeline Canada Windfall 1 Compression Station. This paper describes the gas turbine main features, how the test program was built and discusses FETT results. Moreover, gas turbine field operation experience and lessons learned are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it