MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012317516 · doi:10.1021/bm025651x

On the Characterization of pH-sensitive Liposome/Polymer Complexes

2002· article· en· W2012317516 on OpenAlexaff
Emmanuelle Roux, Michel Lafleur, Émilie Lataste, Pierre Moreau, Jean‐Christophe Leroux

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomacromolecules · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiposomeChemistryPolymerCharacterization (materials science)Polymer chemistryChemical engineeringNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A randomly alkylated copolymer of N-isopropylacrylamide, methacrylic acid and N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone was characterized with regard to its pH- and temperature-triggered conformational change. It was then complexed to liposomes to produce pH-responsive vesicles. Light scattering and differential scanning calorimetry experiments performed at neutral pH revealed that the polymer underwent coil-to-globule phase transition over a wide range of temperatures. At 37 degrees C and pH 7.4, although the polymer was water-soluble, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis showed that it was partly dehydrated. At acidic pH, the decrease in the lower critical solution temperature was accompanied by an increase in cooperativity degree of the phase transition. Complexation of copolymer to liposomes did not substantially influence its phase transition. The liposome/copolymer complexes were stable at neutral pH but rapidly released their contents under acidic conditions. The copolymer slightly increased liposome circulation time following intravenous administration to rats. The addition of poly(ethylene glycol) to the formulation had a detrimental effect on pH-sensitivity but enhanced substantially the circulation time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomacromoleculesSame topicNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207