MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2012350639 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-3645

Abstract 3645: Integrative molecular profiling in serous epithelial ovarian cancer for identification of biomarkers of chemoresistance

2012· article· en· W2012350639 on OpenAlexaff
Madhuri Koti, Ricardo Vidal, Paulo Nuin, Alexandria Haslehurst, Johanne I. Weberpals, Timothy Childs, Peter Bryson, Moyez Dharsee, Ken Evans, Harriet Feilotter, Paul C. Park, Jeremy A. Squire

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologymicroRNAOvarian cancerSerous fluidEpigeneticsCancer researchGene expression profilingCarboplatinPharmacogenomicsCancerGeneOncologyBioinformaticsGene expressionGeneticsMedicineCisplatinChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of death due to gynecological cancers in women in the western world. Development of primary resistance to carboplatin and paclitaxel poses a major challenge in the management of serous epithelial ovarian cancer. To identify the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of instrinsic resistance upon exposure to standard first-line therapy for ovarian cancer, we used microarrays to profile the 1) copy number alteration and SNP, 2) mRNA, 3) miRNA and 4) methylation signatures in a cohort comprising 11 chemoresistant and 14 chemosensitive tumour samples. Copy number analysis showed significant copy number alterations in the chemoresistant group (gains on chromosomal regions, 4q, 6q, 8p, 8q, 19q, 7q and 22q; losses on 8p and 10q) compared to the sensitive group. Gene expression data analysis using R/bioconductor revealed a set of 248 discriminating genes in the two cohorts. Pathway analysis of these genes using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis revealed enrichment in genes primarily involved in epithelial to mesenchymal transition and PI3 Kinase pathway. Additionally, genes related to the pro-inflammatory cytokine pathways, as well as drug transport demonstrated significant differential expression between the two groups. Ongoing concurrent comparative analyses of miRNA profiles within this cohort have also identified several differentially expressed transcripts including mir-34b, mir-155, mir-214, mir-200c and mir-143. Some of these miRNAs have been earlier reported to be associated with tumour progression. Further integrated analysis will elucidate the synergistic roles that the genetic and epigenetic alterations in the deregulation of these and other pathways involved in primary chemoresistance. Our research findings will yield diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers that will lead to development of specific treatment regimens for the improved control of serous epithelial ovarian cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3645. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3645

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment→French-language works237,207→