MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012372031 · doi:10.3892/ijo.23.6.1607

Surrogate end-point biomarker analysis in a retinol chemoprevention trial in current and former smokers with bronchial dysplasia

2003· article· en· W2012372031 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen Lam, Xiaochun Xu, Helga Parker-Klein, J. Le Riche, Calum MacAulay, Martial Guillaud, Andy Coldman, Adi F. Gazdar, Reuben Lotan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Oncology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
FundersNational Cancer InstituteU.S. Public Health Service
KeywordsDysplasiaMedicineRetinolInternal medicineGastroenterologyLung cancerBronchopulmonary dysplasiaPathologyCancerVitaminBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epidemiological studies suggested that vitamin A may be protective against lung cancer, however, recent chemoprevention trials with beta-carotene, a precursor of vitamin A, demonstrated enhancement of lung carcinogenesis among smokers. Whether vitamin A is beneficial or harmful in chemoprevention of lung cancer in smokers has not been resolved. This study was designed to determine the effect of retinol alone in current and former smokers using bronchial dysplasia, nuclear morphometry and retinoic acid receptor-beta (RAR-beta) mRNA expression as surrogate end-point biomarkers (SEBs). Eighty-one current or former smokers with a smoking history of >/=30 pack-years were randomized to receive either placebo or retinol (50,000 IU per day) for six months. Fluorescence bronchoscopy was performed prior to treatment to localize areas suggestive of dysplasia. At least 4 bronchial biopsies were taken per subject including at least two biopsies from apparently normal areas. The same areas were precisely re-biopsied after 6 months. Any new areas suggestive of dysplasia were also biopsied. Changes in the SEBs were assessed before and after treatment. At baseline, the frequency of biopsies negative for RAR-beta expression was: normal (23%), hyperplasia (28%), metaplasia (41%), mild dysplasia (41%), and moderate/severe dysplasia (44%). There was no significant difference in the regression rate between the retinol and placebo groups using histopathology and nuclear morphometry as SEBs. The likelihood of regression was found to be lower in those who continued to smoke during the study (OR=1.86 for those smoking >10 cigarettes per day, p=0.084 to OR=0.95, p=0.26 for those smoking 20+ per day compared to ex-smokers). Retinol was not effective in the up-regulation of RAR-beta in lesions with bronchial dysplasia. We postulate that the lack of effect of retinol on RAR-beta expression among individuals who continued to smoke while taking retinol may be due to suppressive effect of tobacco smoke constituents on RAR-beta expression and/or altered cellular metabolism of retinol to retinoic acid and its isomers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of OncologySame topicLung Cancer Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207