MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W201238165

Optimization of RNA isolation from human ocular tissues and analysis of prostanoid receptor mRNA expression using RT-PCR.

2002· article· en· W201238165 on OpenAlexaff
Angela Kyveris, Erin Maruscak, Michelle Senchyna

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRNA extractionProstanoidRNABiologyMolecular biologyComplementary DNAMessenger RNAReceptorBiochemistryGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The isolation and analysis of human ocular RNA is problematic due to variables such as rapid degradation, tissue composition, and melanin contamination. The purpose of this work was to optimize an extraction protocol for the isolation of intact total RNA from a variety of diverse human ocular tissues and to employ RT-PCR to assess the expression of mRNA coding for all eight prostanoid receptors. METHODS: Total RNA was extracted from human iris, ciliary body, choroid, and retina using an RNeasy(R) Midi Kit. Total RNA was extracted from human cornea, sclera, and optic nerve using Tri-Pure(R) Isolation Reagent. 1.0 microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA and subsequently amplified by PCR (35 cycles) using primers designed against each of the human prostanoid receptor cDNAs. PCR products were analyzed by gel electrophoresis and endonuclease digestion. RESULTS: The total yield and quality of RNA derived from each tissue varied according to tissue composition and the isolation method employed. RT-PCR analysis revealed that each tissue expressed all prostanoid receptor mRNAs, however, 50 cycles of PCR was required to visualize FP receptor expression in scleral tissue. In all cases, prostanoid receptor mRNA expression was significantly lower than in human nonpregnant myometrium, which was used as the positive control. CONCLUSIONS: The different cellular composition of each ocular tissue ultimately dictated the methodology to be employed for the isolation of total RNA. Thus, two extraction protocols were optimized for the isolation of intact high quality RNA from a variety of human ocular tissues. The identification of all prostanoid receptor mRNAs in a diverse set of human ocular tissues suggests potential mechanisms for prostanoid-based therapeutics aimed at IOP reduction and stimulates speculation as to additional physiological and or pathophysiological roles mediated by prostanoids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicGlaucoma and retinal disordersFrench-language works237,207