Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spe2 ZollerO texto se debruça, sistematicamente, sobre o modo como Gotlieb Fichte apresenta a segunda pessoa, tendo o cuidado de não isolar essa exposição, que, com efeito, só pode ser compreendida no contexto integral da obra. Na recomposição do rigoroso movimento de figuras como o “Eu”, o “Mim”, o “Tu” e o “Nós”, pretende-se mostrar como o Eu deve, enfim, ser visto em Fichte, já que se trata, primariamente, de um Nós integral e não de um Nós plural, como uma reconfiguração, em roupagem social (ou protossocial), daquele Eu pré-individual absoluto em que começou a trajetória especulativa de Fichte desde o Eu até o Mim, do Eu ao Tu, do Mim ao Ti e do Ti ao Mim, e ao qual, após a viagem pelo mundo, ela deve enfim conduzir de volta. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Fichte. Primeira Pessoa. Segunda Pessoa. Intersubjetividade.THE SECOND PERSON – Fichte’s Systematic Contribution Günter Zöller The paper examines, systematically, the way in which Gottlieb Fichte presents the second person, heeding not to isolate such exposition, which, in fact, can only be understood in the full context of Fichte’s works. In the recomposition of the rigorous movement of figures such as the ‘I’, the ‘Me’, the ‘You’ and the ‘Us’, the goal is to show how the I should finally be regarded in Fichte, since it is primarily question of an integral Us and not a plural Us, as a reconfiguration, in a social (or proto-social) clothing, of that absolute pre-individual I from whence Fichte’s speculative journey from the I to the Me, from the I to the You, from the Me to the You (oblique), and from the You (oblique) to the Me, started, and to which, after travelling the world, it must eventually lead back. KEY-WORDS: Fichte. First person. Second person. Intersubjectivity.LA DEUXIEME PERSONNE - La contribution systématique de Fichte Günter Zöller Le texte se penche systématiquement sur la manière dont Gotlieb Fichte présente la deuxième personne, en ayant soin de ne pas isoler cette exposition qui, de fait, ne peut être comprise que dans le contexte global de l’oeuvre. Lors de la recomposition du mouvement rigoureux de figures telles que le ‘Je’, le ‘Moi’, le ‘Tu’ et le ‘Nous’, nous avons l’intention de montrer comment le Je doit enfin être perçu chez Fichte puisqu’il s’agit premièrement d’un Nous faisant partie intégrante et non pas d’un Nous pluriel, comme une reconfiguration, revêtu d’un aspect social (ou protosocial), du fameux Je pré-individuel absolu par lequel a commencé la trajectoire spéculative de Fichte depuis le Je jusqu’au Moi, du Je au Tu, du Moi au Toi et du Toi au Moi et qui, après avoir parcouru le monde, doit enfin revenir au point de départ. MOTS-CLÉS: Fichte. Première Personne. Deuxième Personne. Intersubjectivité. Günter. Publicação Online do Caderno CRH no Scielo: http://www.scielo.br/ccrh Publicação Online do Caderno CRH: http://www.cadernocrh.ufba.br
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".