MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012471557 · doi:10.1021/ic702281k

Spectroscopic Effects of Excited-State Coupling in a Tetragonal Chromium(III) Complex

2008· article· en· W2012471557 on OpenAlexaff
Rémi Beaulac, Christian Reber

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryTetragonal crystal systemChromiumExcited stateCoupling (piping)Chemical physicsComputational chemistryPhotochemistryCrystallographyAtomic physicsCrystal structureMetallurgyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detailed low-temperature single-crystal polarized absorption and luminescence spectra of Cs2[CrCl2(H2O)4]Cl3 are reported. The luminescence spectrum is a broad band with a maximum at 11,800 cm (-1), indicating that the trans-[CrCl2(H2O)4]+ complex emits from a quartet excited state. The resolved vibronic structure reveals a progression in a nontotally symmetric 445 cm (-1) b1g mode, a manifestation of a Jahn-Teller effect in the emitting state. The absorption spectrum shows completely linearly polarized, magnetic-dipole-allowed electronic origins, defining the tetragonal splitting of the states originating from 4T2g (Oh). An energy gap of approximately 800 cm (-1) is observed between the electronic origins of the emitting state and the onset of the pi-polarized absorption spectrum. Both Jahn-Teller and spin-orbit couplings in the orbitally degenerate 4Eg (D4h) state are necessary to account for the spectroscopic observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicLanthanide and Transition Metal ComplexesFrench-language works237,207