MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012496660 · doi:10.3149/fth.0503.174

Daddy's Come Home: Evangelicalism, Fatherhood and Lessons for Boys in Late Nineteenth-Century Britain

2007· article· en· W2012496660 on OpenAlexaff
Stephanie Olsen

Bibliographic record

VenueFathering A Journal of Theory Research and Practice about Men as Fathers · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeSociologyCentralitySubject (documents)Gender studiesAestheticsLiteraturePhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fears in fin-de-siecle Britain that fathers were absenting themselves from the home prompted a reaction from the evangelical periodical press, orchestrated by the Religious Tract Society, in an attempt to preserve “traditional” domestic ideals of fatherly men. These journals creatively deployed narratives, both fictional and non, that re-emphasised the centrality of male influence in the home, importantly within the idiom of Evangelicalism. Not only was the message— a refashioning of the Holy Trinity: the heavenly Father, the earthly father and the surrogate father (as replacement for the absent father)—critical in upholding the virtues of domesticated men, but the media themselves became crucial “surrogates,” guiding boys in fatherly ways to compensate for the perceived absence of real fathers. The preponderance of literature on the subject of domesticated, moral and religious fathers ought to make us question the “flight from domesticity” to suggest, perhaps at least rhetorically, that “Daddy’s Come Home.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.011
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFathering A Journal of Theory Research and Practice about Men as FathersSame topicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesFrench-language works237,207