Preparations, Characterizations, and Structures of (Biimidazole)dihalobis(triphenylphosphine)rhenium(III) Salts: Strong Ion-Pairing and Acid−Base Properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two-electron reduction occurs when the Re(V) precursors ReOX3(PPh3)2 and ReO(OEt)X2(PPh3)2 are reacted with biimidazole (biimH2) in boiling chloroform, affording rhenium(III) cationic complexes of the type cis,trans-[ReX2(PPh3)2(biimH2)]X with X = Cl, Br, and I. Crystal structures are determined for the compounds with the three halogens, as well as for the [ReCl2(PPh3)2(biimH2)](benzoate) salt. In all cases, the counterion is attached to the complex cation via hydrogen bonding with the N-H groups of coordinated biimidazole. Variable-temperature 1H NMR spectroscopy shows that a mixture of [ReCl2(PPh3)2(biimH2)](benzoate) and [ReCl2(PPh3)2(biimH2)]Cl is in slow exchange below -50 degrees C in CD2Cl2, indicating that ion pairing is retained in solution. Both N-H groups can be deprotonated with sodium methoxide, and their acidities are evaluated from UV-visible spectra. Competition between monodeprotonated [ReCl2(PPh3)2(biimH)] and various carboxylic acids reveals that the acidity of the first N-H proton corresponds to that of acetic acid (pKa(aq) approximately 4.8). By a similar competitive reaction between bis-deprotonated [ReCl2(PPh3)2(biim)]- and phenols, the second acidity is estimated to be close to that of phenol (pKa(aq) approximately 9.8).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".