MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Predator Complex of the White-Fir Woolly Aphids (Genus Dreyfusia, Adelgidae)

2009· article· de· W2012599702 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
H. Pschorn‐Walcher, H. Zwölfer

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie · 2009
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyVoltinismPredatorDiapauseInstarBotanyZoologyHost (biology)PredationEcologyLarva

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The white fir woolly aphids of Europe are provisionally divided into: 1 a) Dreyfusia piceae form typica, an euryoekous (i. e. - with wide ecological tolerances), obligatory multivoltine form, living on the trunks of Abies pectinata (= alba), and on A. balsamea in Canada; 1b) D. piceae form aggressiva, a facultative multivoltine form, on seedlings, young trees and on trunks of older firs, which shows morphological differences, and is somewhat intermediate between piceae and nüsslini; 2 a) D. nüsslini (= nordmannianae) form typica, mainly univoltine, on needles, twigs and trunks of younger trees in warmer locations; 2 b) D. nüsslini form schneideri, mainly univoltine, on the trunks of old firs in various stands, corresponding morphologically with typica. The predator complex attacking these aphids includes three groups: a) species with regular occurence, great abundance and host specificity, including Aphidoletes thompsoni, Cremifania nigrocellulata, Leucopomyia obscura, Cnemodon dreyfusiae, Laricobius erichsoni, and Pullus impexus; b) species of regular occurence, but with lower abundance and less host specificity, including Aphidecta obliterata, Cnemodon latitarsis, Syrphus arcuatus, Chrysopa ventralis, and Trombidiid mites; c) a number of incidental species. Table 1 shows the choices of food and the prey preferences of the main predators. All species, except the Trombidiids (preying upon adults only), feed on eggs and crawlers, and in later instars also on adult aphids. Neosistentes in diapause are hardly attacked. The number of species comprising the predator complex associated with D. piceae is considerably larger than that associated with D. nüsslini. Fig. 3 illustrates the influence of temperature on the spring activity of Laricobius and Cremifania. Fig. 4 shows the sequence of predators in relation to prey development. The adaptation of predator development to the cycle of the prey is dependend on diapause, and is accomplished in different ways. Egg diapause is found in Pullus only; diapause in young larval instars is present in Chrysopa, and in Leucopomyia; diapause in fullgrown larvae is found in both Cnemodon species, prepupal diapause occurs in Cremifania and Aphidoletes; diapause in adult stages is shown by Laricobius and Pullus, and in the latter species is a second precaution for hibernation. D. piceae typica is present in low densities (ten to several hundred aphids per 10 sq. yd.) in practically all stands examined, even where few firs are to be found. However, outbreaks are more restricted ecologically. Only the Trombidiids, and to a certain extent, the larvae of Pullus (only at densities greater than 500 aphids per 10 sq. yd.) are found at normal (i. e.-lower) host densities. Laricobius, Aphidecta, Chrysopa, and especially the dipterons, prefer denser prey infestations. Investigations on the predator-prey relationships were handicapped in 1955 by an great reduction in numbers of D. piceae typica and its uniform replacement by D. nüsslini schneideri. Earlier studies in the literature are discussed in relation to our own observations. The breakdown of a mass propagation seems to be caused by the interaction of several factors of varying importance, such as predators, crowding and exhaustion of the substratum, decrease in vitality, and climatic influences. This requires further investigation. Zusammenfassung Ernährungsphysiologische, bionomische und ökologische Unterschiede erfordern für die drei von Börner (1952) unterschiedenen mitteleuropäischen Weißtannenläuse der Gattung Dreyfusia eine weitere vorläufige Aufteilung. Ökologisch läßt sich der Vertilgerkreis dieser Arten wie folgt gliedern: 1. Vorherrschende Arten mit meist hoher Abundanz, Konstanz und oft enger Wirtsbindung; 2. Zurücktretende Arten mit geringer Abundanz, oft hoher Konstanz und lockerer Wirtsbindung und 3. Gelegentlich auftretende Arten mit geringer Abundanz und Konstanz sowie großem Wirtskreis. - Die für diese drei Gruppen festgestellten Vertilgerarten werden namhaft gemacht und über ihre Nahrungswahl, Wirtsspezifität, Erscheinungszeit, Fraßdauer sowie Diapause Einzelheiten mitgeteilt. Einige der Vertilgerarten treten noch bei geringer Wirtsdichte auf, andere sind an Massenbefall der Läuse gebunden. - Der Zusammenbruch einer Massenvermehrung der Stammläuse ist das Ergebnis voneinander abhängiger und zugleich von klimatischen Einflüssen überlagerter Vorgänge (Vertilgerkreis, Raum- und Nahrungskonkurrenz, Vitalitätsverminderung, Klima). Jede dieser Faktorengruppen kann von Fall zu Fall in verschiedenem Ausmaß wirken. Eine ausführlichere deutsche Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse unserer „Neueren Untersuchungen über die Weißtannenläuse der Gattung Dreyfusia C. B. u. ihren Vertilgerkreis” erscheint im „Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde” 1956.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.490
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für Angewandte EntomologieSame topicInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlFrench-language works237,207