MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012599763 · doi:10.1074/jbc.c500040200

The mRNA Nuclear Export Factor Hpr1 Is Regulated by Rsp5-mediated Ubiquitylation

2005· article· en· W2012599763 on OpenAlexaff
Carole Gwizdek, Maria Hobeika, Bart Kus, Batool Ossareh‐Nazari, Catherine Dargemont, Manuel S. Rodríguez

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsUbiquitinChemistryMessenger RNACell biologyBiologyGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ubiquitin conjugation and in particular two distinct HECT ubiquitin ligases, Rsp5p and Tom1p, have been shown to participate in the regulation of mRNA export in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The identification of the ubiquitin ligase substrates represents a major challenge in understanding how this modification may modulate mRNA export. Here, we identified Hpr1p, a member of the THO/TREX (transcription/export) complex that couples mRNA transcription to nuclear export as a target of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Hpr1p degradation is enhanced at high temperature and appears linked to on-going RNA-polymeraseII-mediated transcription. Interestingly, the stability of the other THO complex components is not affected under these conditions indicating that Hpr1p turnover could control the formation of the THO/TREX complex and consequently mRNA export. Using in vivo and in vitro approaches we demonstrate that Rsp5p is responsible for the ubiquitylation of Hpr1p that also involves the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc4p. Thus, Hpr1p represents the first nuclear export factor regulated by ubiquitylation, strongly suggesting that this post-translational modification participates in the coordination of transcription and mRNA export processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysFrench-language works237,207