Structural isomerism in (p-XC6H4)SeCl3 and (p-XC6H4)SeBr3 (X = F, Cl) compounds. Co-crystallisation of cis- and trans-dimeric forms of (p-ClC6H4)SeCl2(μ-Cl)2(p-ClC6H4)SeCl2. A new structural modification for the “PhSeBr” reagent, Ph2Se2Br2, containing an elongated Se–Se bond
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of di(para-halophenyl)diselenides, (p-XC(6)H(4))(2)Se(2) (X = F, Cl) have been reacted with three equivalents of SO(2)Cl(2) or Br(2), leading to the formation of selenium(iv) RSeX(3) compounds. The structures of (p-FC(6)H(4))SeX(3) (X = Cl, Br) have been determined, and both exhibit a dimeric RSeX(2)(μ-X)(2)RSeX(2) structure consisting of two "saw-horse" (p-FC(6)H(4))SeX(3) units linked by two halide bridges, with an overall square pyramidal geometry at selenium. In both structures all the selenium and halogen atoms are planar, with both aryl rings located on the same side of the Se(2)X(6) plane (cis-isomer). The structure of (p-ClC(6)H(4))SeCl(3) also adopts a planar dimeric structure, however both cis- and trans-dimeric molecules are co-crystallised in the unit cell. In contrast, the structure of (p-ClC(6)H(4))SeBr(3) adopts a folded cis-dimeric structure due to steric constraints. Secondary Se···X interactions to the "vacant" sixth coordination site at selenium are a feature of most of these structures, but are most prominent in the folded structure of (p-ClC(6)H(4))SeBr(3). A re-examination of the PhSeBr/PhSeBr(3) system resulted in the isolation of crystals of a second structural form of "PhSeBr". The structure of Ph(2)Se(2)Br(2) consists of two PhSeBr units linked by an elongated Se-Se bond of 2.832(4) Å, and longer secondary Se···Br interactions of 3.333(4) Å to form a chain structure. Further weak Se···Br and Br···Br interactions are present, which form loosely linked rippled sheets of selenium and bromine atoms, similar to the sheets observed for the tetrameric form, Ph(4)Se(4)Br(4).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".