Pyogenic Granuloma: Pyogenic Again? Association between Pyogenic Granuloma and Bartonella
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pyogenic granulomas (PG) are benign vascular lesions which were thought to have an infectious etiology, yet none has been found. Bacillary angiomatosis (BA), which presents as disseminated vascular lesions in immunosuppressed patients, and verruga peruana (VP), which presents as crops of vascular nodules in immunocompetent persons, are caused by infection with Bartonella. Thus, the question was raised whether Bartonella could be associated with the development of PG, also a vasoproliferative lesion like BA and VP. The objective of this study was to determine through a case-control study whether such an association exists. METHODS: Patients who presented with PG and age and sex-matched controls with capillary hemangiomas and senile (cherry) angiomas were tested for serum IgG antibodies against Bartonella using an immunofluorescence antibody method. The prevalence of positive serology was compared between the groups. RESULTS: Twenty PG patients and 20 control patients with hemangiomas or angiomas were studied. Six out of 20 PG patients tested positive (30%), while none of the 20 control patients tested positive (0%). The difference between the proportions of seropositivity in the two groups reached statistical significance (p = 0.02, df = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Pyogenic granuloma patients were determined to have a statistically higher prevalence of Bartonella seropositivity compared with control patients. Further studies are needed to confirm the association and establish a possible etiological link. Such an association could have potential therapeutic importance. A nonsurgical approach with antibiotics may be possible and may decrease the recurrence rate and occurrence of satellite lesions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".