MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012697184 · doi:10.1080/09084280802644128

Interpretation of the RBANS in Inpatient Psychiatry: Clinical Normative Data and Prevalence of Low Scores for Patients with Schizophrenia

2009· article· en· W2012697184 on OpenAlex
Grant L. Iverson, Brian L. Brooks, Glenn Haley

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Neuropsychology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Mental Health & Substance Use Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRepeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological StatusNormativePsychologyPercentile rankPsychiatrySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Clinical psychologySchizophrenia spectrumNeuropsychologyPercentilePsychosisCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS; Randolph, 1998 Randolph , C. ( 1998 ). Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status manual . San Antonio , TX : The Psychological Corporation . [Google Scholar]) is a screening battery designed to measure attention and processing speed, expressive language, visual-spatial and constructional abilities, and immediate and delayed memory. Clinical normative data for a large sample of inpatients and outpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders is available (Wilk, Gold, Humber, Dickerson, Fenton, & Buchanan, 2004 Wilk , C. M. , Gold , J. M. , Humber , K. , Dickerson , F. , Fenton , W. S. , & Buchanan , R. W. ( 2004 ). Brief cognitive assessment in schizophrenia: Normative data for the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological status . Schizophrenia Research , 70 ( 2–3 ), 175 – 186 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). The purpose of this study was to replicate and extend the clinical normative data for the RBANS for use in inpatient psychiatry. Participants were 174 inpatients from a provincial psychiatric hospital with a diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Median performance on the RBANS was 1–2 standard deviations (SDs) below the mean. Patients with more than 12 years of education performed significantly better on every index score than patients with 12 or fewer years of education. Men performed better than women on the Visuospatial/Constructional Index (Cohen's d = .47). When examining all five Index scores simultaneously, it was common for inpatients to obtain three or more frankly impaired scores (i.e., less than the 2nd percentile). Overall, the performance of this inpatient sample was very similar to the clinical normative data presented by Wilk et al. (2004 Wilk , C. M. , Gold , J. M. , Humber , K. , Dickerson , F. , Fenton , W. S. , & Buchanan , R. W. ( 2004 ). Brief cognitive assessment in schizophrenia: Normative data for the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological status . Schizophrenia Research , 70 ( 2–3 ), 175 – 186 .[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Detailed normative tables by diagnosis, education, and gender are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it