MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2012711258 · doi:10.1139/t02-107

Méthode de localisation des moraines de convergence dans une ancienne vallée glaciaire (Pyrénées, France) : conséquences sur les instabilités des moraines et reconstruction des glaciers au Würm

2003· article· en· W2012711258 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Richard Fabre, Jean‐Pierre Texier, Bernard Clément, Thomas Lebourg

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoraineGeologyGlacial periodGeomorphologyGlacierLandslideStage (stratigraphy)Physical geographyPaleontologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we show how it is possible to locate the thickest of till areas from the geological and geomorphological map-making of glacial formations in high mountain sites. This qualitative information is the result of a mapping methodology realized in two stages, and applied to an old glaciated Pyrenees valley, the Aspe valley. In the first stage, we show the need to draw the map of the undifferentiated glacial formations to establish the geomorphological Aspe valley map during the Würm (–10 000 to –70 000 BC). This period of glaciation is correlated to the Northern Europe glacial Weichselien episode. The second stage consists in superimposing the topographic and geomorphological maps to determine the altimetric position of the lateral and convergence tills of the various glaciers. The method proposed makes it possible to obtain on a map, the position of the thickest convergence tills. The thickest of the convergence tills is verified in the field by different electrical surveys. Also, we observed that more than 50% of the landslides present in this valley are probably of Holocene age, but not reactivated at present. This can be explained by the strong variation of their mechanical characteristics compared with the slope of the side and the substratum. We show that the suggested map-making method can be applied, under certain conditions, to other glaciated valleys.Key words: Pyrenees, Würm (Weichselian age), glacial modelling, moraine, landslides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical Journal→Same topicLandslides and related hazards→French-language works237,207→