MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012740717 · doi:10.1080/00223890903087430

Interventional Use of the Parent–Child Interaction Assessment–II Enactments: Modifying an Abused Mother's Attributions to Her Son

2009· article· en· W2012740717 on OpenAlexaff
Richard J. Holigrocki, Robbi Crain, Yvonne Bohr, Kelly Anne Young, Heather E. Bensman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Personality Assessment · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthBohr modelPsychologyPsychopathologyAttributionPsychiatrySocial psychologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe the assessment and treatment of a mother who was a victim of domestic violence and of her 10-year-old son, both of whom were living in a domestic violence shelter. The Parent–Child Interaction Assessment–II Modifying Attributions of Parents intervention (PCIA–II/MAP; Bohr, 2005 Bohr, Y. 2005. Infant mental health programs: Experimenting with innovative models. Infant Mental Health Journal, 26: 407–422. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]; Bohr et al., 2008 Bohr, Y., Dhayanandhan, B., Armour, L., Sockett DiMarco, N., Holigrocki, R. and Baumgartner, E. 2008. Mapping parent–infant interactions: A brief cognitive approach to the prevention of relationship ruptures and infant maltreatment (the MAP method). Infant Mental Health Promotion: IMPrint., 51: 2–7. [Google Scholar]; Bohr & Holigrocki, 2005 Bohr, Y. 2005. Infant mental health programs: Experimenting with innovative models. Infant Mental Health Journal, 26: 407–422. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) is a structured brief treatment using video recordings from a parent's play with his or her child. The play involves using toy people and animals to complete story stems related to a trip to the zoo (see Holigrocki, Kaminski, & Frieswyk, 1999 Holigrocki, R. J., Kaminski, P. L. and Frieswyk, S. H. 1999. Introduction to the Parent-Child Interaction Assessment. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 63: 413–428. [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], 2002 Holigrocki, R. J. and Kaminski, P. L. 2002. A structural and microanalytic exploration of parent-child relational psychopathology. Constructivism in the Human Sciences, 7: 111–123. [Google Scholar]). The therapist shows the parent video excerpts of the interaction, invites reflection and commentary, and collaborates with the parent to change how she makes sense of her child's behaviors. The pretreatment assessment revealed a depressed, fearful, highly stressed mother with a harsh parenting style. Her son experienced significant distress; had behavior problems; and viewed adults as harsh, fragile, irresponsible, and unavailable. Posttreatment gains were evident in the parent's reduced depression and greater parenting sensitivity; however, parenting stress and child behavior problems remained elevated. We emphasize the utility and application of a multimodal assessment that integrates rating scales, free response, and video-recorded interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Personality AssessmentSame topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207