MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MIXED-STOCK ANALYSIS OF ATLANTIC COD NEAR THE GULF OF ST. LAWRENCE BASED ON MICROSATELLITE DNA

2000· article· en· W2012756485 on OpenAlexaffabout
Daniel E. Ruzzante, Christopher T. Taggart, Shelley L. C. Lang, Doug Cook

Bibliographic record

VenueEcological Applications · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGadusAtlantic codOverwinteringGadidaeStock (firearms)FisheryPopulationEcologyMicrosatelliteGenetic structureBiologyGeographyGenetic variationDemographyGeneticsArchaeologyAllele

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The collapse of various stock complexes of cod (Gadus morhua) in the northwest Atlantic has prompted a clarification of relationships among stock components. Here we examine the genetic composition of >2300 cod collected during 1994–1997 in the Gulf of St. Lawrence and its approaches to determine whether: (1) stock components can be genetically identified; (2) population structure is temporally stable; (3) components are always separated and, if not, where and when are they mixed; and (4) component contributions to mixtures can be estimated. We use polymorphism at six microsatellite DNA loci from cod collected on or near their spring and summer spawning grounds to examine structure and then employ maximum likelihood analyses to estimate contributions of each component to mixtures overwintering near the entrance to the Gulf. Estimates of genetic structure (FST and RST) reveal significant differences among cod populations during stock-separated periods, and the structure appears to be temporally stable. Multidimensional scaling analysis of estimates of genetic distance (DA) suggest that the structure results from differences among cod collected within the Gulf of St. Lawrence and those collected near the entrance to the Gulf on either side of the Laurentian Channel in the Cabot Strait, as well as among cod collected south of Newfoundland along the north side of the Channel. Weak genetic heterogeneity among seven regional mixed-stock collections during the overwintering period suggests that cod aggregations characteristically found in the overwintering region represent population mixtures that differ in the proportion of cod contributed to them by the various stock components. Maximum likelihood estimates indicate no significant temporal changes in component contributions to the mixed-stock samples between 1996 and 1997 when all of the winter mixed-stock samples were pooled. The combined contribution of cod from the southern and northern Gulf of St. Lawrence to the mixed-stock samples ranged between 46% and 71% (expected 64%). More precise estimates of contributions from these two regions are precluded by the weak genetic differentiation detected in our samples. The contribution by cod from the Cape Breton Island region was small and estimated at 3%. Contributions by cod from the eastern Scotian Shelf, southwest Newfoundland and south-central Newfoundland were in the range of 13–14%, 4%, and 8%, respectively. Contributions by inshore cod from Placentia and Fortune Bays in south Newfoundland were small to negligible (∼3% each). The results indicate that future management could be designed around the spatial and temporal scale of the stock structure identified during the stock-separated period and around the spatially varying contributions to the overwintering mixed-stock fishery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations89
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcological ApplicationsSame topicGenetic diversity and population structureFrench-language works237,207