MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012846890 · doi:10.1634/stemcells.19-3-260

New Stem Cell Workshop

2001· article· nl· W2012846890 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
D. W. van Bekkum

Bibliographic record

VenueStem Cells · 2001
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyStem cellComputational biologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STEM CELLS 2001;19:260-262 www.StemCells.com On September 18 and 19, 2000, more than 120 scientists from all over the world convened in Leiden, the Netherlands, to participate in a workshop on the plasticity of stem cells from adult tissues. The occasion was in celebration of the completion of the new building of the Dutch biotech company, Crucell. This meeting included wet workshops, i.e., demonstrations in the laboratory of the various quite sensational recent discoveries. The opportunity to organize such demonstrations arose from the availability of equipped but not occupied laboratories just prior to the move from the old premises. The meeting was funded jointly by Crucell and the Comprehensive Cancer Center at Rotterdam. P. Quesenberry (Boston) described changes in engraftment properties with various stages of the cell cycle of mouse hematopoietic stem cells. Bone marrow from male mice was cultured in the presence of growth factors and used at various intervals for competitive engraftment experiments in irradiated female recipients. The cycle parameters were determined for lineage-rhodaminelow Hoechstlow stem cells that were purified and then cultured separately under identical conditions. Competitive grafting capacity of the bone marrow as determined by Southern blot analysis revealed a decrease during late S and M phases and an increase again during G1 and early S phases. These findings are highly suggestive of reversible changes in the phenotype of stem cells as they move through the cell cycle, but some uncertainty remains because the two properties that were compared had to be determined in separate cell populations. S. Knaan-Shanzer (Leiden) provided evidence for a reversal of differentiation of primitive hematopoietic stem cells as defined by current surface markers using human cord-blood-derived cells. Within the CD34 population, the early lineage markers’ negative (ELM–) subpopulation, defined by these authors as CD34++, CD33, CD38, CD71–, can repopulate the bone marrow of non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) mice, while the ELM+ population cannot, and was therefore considered to be more differentiated. Following culturing on stroma in the absence of serum, the latter cells generated ELM– cells and acquired repopulating ability. The authors consider that this finding challenges the concept of hierarchy within the primitive stem cell compartment and favors the idea of stem cell plasticity. Under different conditions (fetal bovine serum and growth factors), C. Dorrell and F. Mazurier from John Dick’s laboratory in Toronto demonstrated a large expansion of CD34+38– cells in cord blood cultures without an increase in NOD/SCID repopulating capacity. These observations suggest a dissociation between surface markers and functional phenotype but would also fit the hypothesis that repopulating stem cells constitute an as yet unidentified subpopulation of lineage– cells. The session on neural stem cells focused on the isolation of these cells from adult mouse brain. These cells are most prevalent in the walls of the lateral ventricles and may form colonies in vitro, the so-called neurospheres. After a certain period of culture, the neural cells derived from Rosa mice (these mice are transgenic for LacZ, which encodes for the marker E. coli beta-galactosidase) were grafted into chicken or mouse embryos by J. Frisen et al. (Copenhagen). They demonstrated their grafting technique into the amniotic cavity Meeting Report Stem Cells

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.113

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStem CellsSame topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207