Clinical and Laboratory Factors Associated With the Severity of Proliferative Sickle Cell Retinopathy in Patients With Sickle Cell Hemoglobin C (SC) and Homozygous Sickle Cell (SS) Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proliferative sickle cell retinopathy (PSCR) is the most frequent vision-threatening complication of sickle cell disease (SCD). We investigated the relationship between the severity of sickle cell retinopathy in heterozygous (SC) or homozygous (SS) adult SCD patients and the clinical and laboratory data obtained during visits to a national SCD referral center. This retrospective longitudinal analysis included 942 SCD patients (313 patients with SC and 629 with SS disease) with ophthalmologic evaluations who were followed over a 19-year period by a multidisciplinary team in a referral center. PSCR was graded using the Goldberg classification. We identified patient and SCD characteristics associated with sickle cell retinopathy severity using multinomial logistic-regression models. Multivariate analysis associated severe PSCR forms (stages III-V) with older age (p=0.032), pulmonary involvement (documented pulmonary hypertension with pulmonary arterial pressure≥40 mm Hg, restrictive syndrome>20%, or previous history of pulmonary embolism diagnosed by vascular imaging) (p=0.029), deafness or tinnitus (p=0.026), and no history of osteomyelitis (p=0.013) for SC patients; and with older age (p<0.001), male sex (p=0.003), and acute pyelonephritis (p=0.04) for SS patients. The model of severe PSCR versus no PSCR showed good calibration and discrimination for SC and SS patients. Awareness of the clinical and laboratory factors significantly associated with severe PSCR in patients with SC or SS SCD may contribute to improved preventive strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".