MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2012894518 · doi:10.1021/ma070372t

Effect of Ionic Binding on the Self-Diffusion of Anionic Dendrimers and Hydrophilic Polymers in Aqueous Systems as Studied by Pulsed Gradient NMR Techniques

2007· article· en· W2012894518 on OpenAlexafffund
Héloïse Thérien‐Aubin, X. X. Zhu, Charles N. Moorefield, Kishore K. Kotta, George R. Newkome

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNMR spectroscopy and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersDivision of ChemistryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDendrimerCationic polymerizationVinyl alcoholDiffusionPolymer chemistryAqueous solutionPolymerChemistryIonic bondingPolyelectrolyteIonic strengthPulsed field gradientSelf-diffusionPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryMoleculeThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulsed gradient NMR techniques including diffusion-ordered NMR spectroscopy have been used to study the self-diffusion of three carboxylated dendrimers in aqueous solutions of neutral poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and of cationic poly(allyl amine) (PAAm). The ionic interaction between the cationic PAAm network and the anionic dendrimers had the most significant effect on the diffusion of the dendrimers in the system. The self-diffusion coefficients of the dendrimers in PAAm were an order of magnitude lower than in PVA and more widely distributed, and the activation energy for the displacement of the dendrimers in PAAm was higher than that in PVA. The effects of the dendrimer size, polymer concentration, and temperature on the diffusion of the dendrimers have also been studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicNMR spectroscopy and applicationsFrench-language works237,207